Highmark Commercial Medical Policy in Pennsylvania


 
Printer Friendly Version

Section: Miscellaneous
Number: G-24
Version: 042
Topic: Obesity
Effective Date: April 28, 2014
Issued Date: April 28, 2014
Date Last Reviewed: 01/2014

General Policy Guidelines

Indications and Limitations of Coverage

Medical Treatment
Treatment of obesity is excluded from medical coverage. However, covered services for the medical treatment for morbid obesity are eligible for reimbursement. Coverage for the medical treatment of morbid obesity is determined according to individual or group customer benefits.

Surgical Treatment
There are a variety of surgeries intended for the treatment of morbid obesity.

  1. Gastric restrictive surgical procedures (e.g., vertical banded gastroplasty, gastric stapling, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), mini-gastric bypass, gastric bypass with Roux-en-Y) create a small gastric pouch, resulting in weight loss from early satiety and decreased dietary intake. The decreased capacity of the stomach reduces the volume of food an individual consumes before feeling full.
  2. Malabsorptive surgical procedures (e.g., biliopancreatic diversion, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, long-limb gastric bypass, intestinal gastric bypass) bypass a section of the small intestines. Weight loss results from intestinal malabsorption without dietary modification.
  3. Gastric restrictive and malabsorptive procedure: Roux-en Y gastric bypass combines both restrictive and malabsorptive elements. The restrictive elements can be achieved by stapling the stomach into two sections. The top section becomes a small pouch that serves as the “new” stomach. The small size of this newly formed stomach is so reduced that it “restricts” or limits the amount of food intake. It also provides a feeling of fullness and satisfaction with smaller portions of food. The lower section of the stomach no longer receives stores and mixes food but remains functional by continuing to secrete digestive juices.

The following procedures are covered for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity when all of the patient selection criteria are met. (Note: Coverage for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity is determined according to individual or group customer benefits.)

  • Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using an FDA-approved adjustable gastric band (43770)

    Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding involves creating a gastric pouch by placing a gastric band around the exterior of the stomach. The band is attached to a reservoir that is implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal fascia in the patient’s upper abdomen. Injecting the reservoir with saline will alter the diameter of the gastric band. This limits food consumption and creates an earlier feeling of fullness. Subsequent adjustments can be made either to tighten or loosen the band to meet individual patient needs.
NOTE:
Currently, the adjustable gastric band is not FDA approved for patients less than 18 years of age. The FDA premarket approval for the LAP-BAND System indicates it is for use only in severely obese adult patients. (The clinical study that was submitted to the FDA for approval of the LAP-BAND was restricted to adults, ages 18–55 years.) 
  • Biliopancreatic bypass with duodenal switch (43845) for members with a BMI of 50≥  kg/m2 or greater

    The biliopancreatic bypass with duodenal switch is a modification of the biliopancreatic bypass.  The most significant difference from the biliopancreatic bypass to the duodenal switch procedure is utilization of a sleeve gastrectomy of the greater curvature rather than a distal gastrectomy and anastomosis of the ileum to the duodenum instead of the stomach.
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RY-GBP){open (43846) or laparoscopic (43644)}

    The open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered the gold standard for bariatric surgery. A small (30 cc) proximal gastric pouch is constructed which is then divided from the remainder of the stomach just below the cardia with a short (150 cm or less) Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy performed between the proximal gastric pouch and a Roux-en-Y jejunal limb.

  • Gastric stapling (open)(43843)

    Note:
    Code 43843 is not limited to gastric stapling.

    Gastric stapling is accomplished by stapling the upper stomach to create a small pouch into which food flows after it’s swallowed.  The outlet of this pouch is restricted by a band of synthetic mesh, which slows its emptying, so that the person feels full after only a few bites of food.

Patient Selection Criteria for Adults

  1. The patient is morbidly obese;

    Morbid obesity is defined as a condition of consistent and uncontrollable weight gain that is characterized by a weight which is at least 100 lbs. or 100% over ideal weight or a BMI of at least 40 or a BMI of 35 with comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular heart disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus type II, sleep apnea).

  2. The patient is at least 18 years old; and

  3. The patient has received non-surgical treatment (e.g., dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, exercise program, and behavior modification) and attempts at weight loss have failed.

  4. The patient must participate in and meet the criteria of a structured nutrition and exercise program. This includes dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, increased physical activity, behavioral modification, and/or pharmacologic therapy, documented in the medical record.  This structured nutrition and exercise program must meet ALL of the following criteria:

    • The nutrition and exercise program must be supervised and monitored by a physician working in cooperation with dieticians and/or nutritionists; and
    • The nutrition and exercise program(s) must total six (6) visits or more during a period of six (6) consecutive months; and
    • The nutritional and exercise program must occur within two (2) years prior to the surgery; and
    • The patient's participation in a structured nutrition and exercise program must be documented in the medical record by an attending physician who supervised the patient's progress. A physician's summary letter is not sufficient documentation.  Documentation should include medical records of the physician's on-going assessments of the patient's progress throughout the course of the nutrition and exercise program. For patients who participate in a structured nutrition and exercise program, medical records documenting the patient's participation and progress must be available for review.
  5. The patient must complete a psychological evaluation performed by a licensed mental health care professional and be recommended for bariatric surgery. The patient's medical record documentation should indicate that all psychosocial issues have been identified and addressed.

  6. Patient selection is a critical process requiring psychiatric evaluation and a multidisciplinary team approach. The member's understanding of the procedure, and ability to participate and comply with life-long follow-up and the life-style changes (e.g., changes in dietary habits, and beginning an exercise program) are necessary to the success of the procedure.

If the patient does not meet ALL of the patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery, the procedure will be denied as not medically necessary.

Patient Selection Criteria for Adolescents

The eligible bariatric surgical procedures listed above unless otherwise specified are covered for members under the age of 18 years when they meet all of the following patient selection criteria:

  1. Attainment or near-attainment of physiologic/skeletal maturity at approximately, age 13 in girls and 15 for boys. (The patient has attained Tanner 4 pubertal development and final or near-final adult height (e.g., ≥ 95 %) of adult stature).

  2. The patient is morbidly obese defined as a BMI of > 50 or severely obese defined as a BMI > 40 with serious comorbidities:

    • Life threatening cardiopulmonary problems such as severe obstructive sleep apnea, Pickwickian syndrome, obesity related cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, documented coronary artery disease
    • Pseudotumor cerebri
    • Type II Diabetes

  3. The patient has received non-surgical treatment (e.g., dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, exercise program, and behavior modification) and attempts at weight loss have failed.
  4. The patient must participate in and meet the criteria of a structured nutrition and exercise program. This includes dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, increased physical activity, behavioral modification, and/or pharmacologic therapy, documented in the medical record. This structured nutrition and exercise program must meet ALL of the following criteria:

    • The nutrition and exercise program must be supervised and monitored by a physician working in cooperation with dieticians and/or nutritionists; and
    • The nutrition and exercise program(s) must total six (6) visits or more during a period of six (6) consecutive months; and
    • The nutritional and exercise program must occur within two (2) years prior to the surgery; and
    • The patient's participation in a structured nutrition and exercise program must be documented in the medical record by an attending physician who supervised the patient's progress. A physician's summary letter is not sufficient documentation. Documentation should include medical records of the physician's on-going assessments of the patient's progress throughout the course of the nutrition and exercise program. For patients who participate in a structured nutrition and exercise program, medical records documenting the patient's participation and progress must be available for review.

  5. The patient must complete a psychological evaluation performed by a licensed mental health care professional and be recommended for bariatric surgery.  The patient's medical record documentation should indicate that all psychosocial issues have been identified and addressed.

  6. The patient must be able to show decisional capacity and maturity in the psychological evaluation and provide informed assent for surgical management.

  7. The patient must be capable and willing to adhere to nutritional guidelines postoperatively.

  8. The patient must have a supportive and committed family environment.

  9. Patient selection is a critical process requiring psychiatric evaluation and a multidisciplinary team approach. The member's understanding of the procedure and ability to participate and comply with life-long follow-up and the life-style changes (e.g., changes in dietary habits, and beginning an exercise program) are necessary to the success of the procedure.

If the patient does not meet ALL of the patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery, the procedure will be denied as not medically necessary.

Gastric stapling and gastric bypass surgery reported for the treatment of "morbid obesity" should be processed under the appropriate procedure code 43644, 43843, 43846, or 43848 respectively. (See Medical Policy Bulletin S-96 for additional information on laparoscopic surgery.)

In addition, itemized charges reported for gastroduodenostomy and/or surgery should be combined with the stapling or bypass surgery. The gastrojejunostomy in conjunction with gastric stapling or gastric bypass claim should be processed under the appropriate code 43644, 43843, 43846, or 43848. Modifier 59 may be reported with a non-E/M service, to identify it as distinct or independent from other non-E/M services performed on the same day. When modifier 59 is reported, the patient’s records must support its use in accordance with CPT guidelines.

A liver biopsy (10021, 10022, 47001, 47100, 47120, 47122, and 47379), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)(43235-43239, 43241, 43253, and 43259) are considered an inherent part of all bariatric surgical procedures (43644, 43645, 43770-43775, 43843-43848, 43886-43888, and S2083). These services are not eligible for separate payment when reported on the same day as a bariatric surgical procedure. When a doctor reports a liver biopsy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or EGD with a bariatric surgical procedure, the charges should be combined under the appropriate bariatric surgery procedure code. A participating, preferred, or network provider cannot bill the member for the liver biopsy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, or EGD. Modifier 59 may be reported with a non-E/M service, to identify it as distinct or independent from other non-E/M services performed on the same day. When modifier 59 is reported, the patient’s records must support its use in accordance with CPT guidelines.

Sleeve Gastrectomy (43775)
A sleeve gastrectomy is an alternative approach to gastrectomy that can be performed on its own, or in combination with malabsorptive procedures (most commonly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch). In this procedure, the greater curvature of the stomach is resected from the angle of His to the distal antrum, resulting in a stomach remnant shaped like a tube or sleeve. The pyloric sphincter is preserved, resulting in a more physiologic transit of food from the stomach to the duodenum, and avoiding the dumping syndrome (overly rapid transport of food through stomach into intestines) that is seen with distal gastrectomy. This procedure can be performed by an open or laparoscopic technique. Some surgeons have proposed this as the first in a two-stage procedure for very high-risk patients.

Sleeve gastrectomy is an eligible procedure as a first stage of a two-stage procedure, or as a sole definitive procedure.

For high BMI patients in whom the duodenal switch may be difficult, it is reasonable to do a sleeve gastrectomy as the first stage of an intended two-stage duodenal switch. This does permit subsequent assessment of both the efficacy of the sleeve (to see whether the second stage is really needed), or assessment of the compliance of the patient (to see whether the more complicated procedure is justified), or to examine the metabolic and nutritional effects of the sleeve (to see whether potential further metabolic derangements of the duodenal switch would make it unadvisable).

Must meet either 1 (adults) or 2 (adolescents):

  1. For adults age 18 years or older, presence of severe obesity that has persisted for at least the last two (2) years (24 months), documented in contemporaneous clinical records, defined as any of the following:
    • Body mass index (BMI) (see appendix) exceeding 40; or
    • BMI greater than 35 in conjunction with any of the following severe co-morbidities:
      1. Clinically significant obstructive sleep apnea (i.e., patient meets the criteria for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea; Apnea-Hypopnea Index less than 5, or for patients with AHI greater than 20, reduction in AHI is greater than 75%;  or
      2. Coronary heart disease; or
      3. Medically refractory hypertension (blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg systolic and/or 90 mmHg diastolic despite optimal medical management); or
      4. Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  2. For adolescents who have completed bone growth (generally age 13 in girls and age 15 in boys), presence of obesity with severe comorbidities:
    • BMI exceeding 40 with one or more of the following serious comorbidities:
      1. Clinically significant obstructive sleep apnea (Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children is a disorder of breathing during sleep, characterized by prolonged partial upper airway obstruction and/or intermittent and complete obstruction, which may be accompanied by hypoxia, hypercapnia and disturbed sleep; or
      2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus; or
      3. Pseudotumor comorbidities.
    • BMI exceeding 50 with one or more of the following less serious comorbidities:
      1. Medically refractory hypertension (A condition characterized by BP ≥140/90, or ≥160/90 if >60 and absent features of 2º HTN, maximal dose of 2+ antihypertensives is being administered, and adequate time has passed to allow the usual antihypertensives to be effective), or
      2. Hypertension; or
      3. Dyslipidemias; or
      4. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; or
      5. Venous stasis disease; or
      6. Significant impairment in activities of daily living; or
      7. Intertriginous soft-tissue infections; or
      8. Stress urinary incontinence; or
      9. Gastroesophageal reflux disease; or
      10. Weight-related arthropathies that impair physical activity; or
      11. Obesity-related psychosocial distress.

Repeat or Revised Bariatric Surgical Procedures (43771-43774, 43848, and 43886-43888)

Surgical repair following gastric bypass and gastric restrictive procedure may be considered medically necessary when there is documentation of a surgical complication related to the original surgery, such as a fistula, obstruction, erosion, disruption/leakage of a suture/staple line, bad herniation, or pouch enlargement with vomiting.

Repeat surgical procedures for revision or conversion to another surgical procedure (that also may be considered medically necessary within this document) for inadequate weight loss, (that is, unrelated to a surgical complication of a prior procedure) may be considered medically necessary when all the following criteria are met:

  • The individual continues to meet all the medical necessity criteria for bariatric surgery
  • There is documentation of compliance with the previously prescribed postoperative dietary and exercise program; and
  • Two (2) years following the original surgery, weight loss is less than 50% of pre-operative excess body weight and weight remains at least 30% over ideal body weight (taken from standard tables for adult weight ranges based on height, body frame, gender and age, an example is available from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [NHLBI] at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/bmi_tbl.htm).

Repeat procedures for repair, revision, or conversion to another surgical procedure following a gastric bypass or gastric restrictive procedure are considered not medically necessary when the criteria listed above are not met.

Revision of a sleeve gastrectomy is medically necessary for the following:

  • Intractable GERD or reflux may require revision of a sleeve into a gastric bypass, by dividing the sleeve proximally, then constructing a Roux limb, then a gastrojejunostomy.
  • Persistent narrowing or stricture at a portion of the sleeve may make resection of that segment necessary or revision into a gastric bypass.
  • A chronic leak may mandate resection or revision.
  • Inadequate weight loss, or weight regain due to dilation of the sleeve. 
  • Revision to a gastric bypass or to a duodenal switch for inadequate weight loss.

Services that do not meet the criteria of this policy will not be considered medically necessary. A Pennsylvania participating, preferred or network provider cannot bill the member for the denied service unless: (a) the provider has given advance written notice, informing the member that the service may be deemed not medically necessary; (b) the member is provided with an estimate of the cost; and (c) the member agrees in writing to assume financial responsibility in advance of receiving the service. The signed agreement must be maintained in the provider’s records. Out of Network/Non-participating providers and providers located outside of Pennsylvania may be able to bill members if the service is denied.

Endoscopic procedures (43999)(e.g., insertion of the StomaphyX™ device, ROSE procedure) to treat weight gain after bariatric surgery to remedy large gastric stoma or large gastric pouches are considered experimental/investigational. Well-designed large population, multicenter, controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed. A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for the denied service. The StomaphyX™ device was approved in March 2007 by the FDA through the 510(k) process. It is being used in endoluminal transoral tissue approximation and ligation in the gastrointestinal tract.

The StomaphyX device is also used in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. See Medical Policy Bulletin S-145 for information on endoscopic/endoluminal gastroplasty or gastroplication with suturing of the esophagogastric junction in the treatment of GERD.

The following procedures are considered experimental/investigational, and therefore, they are not covered.  A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for the non-covered service.

  • Biliopancreatic bypass (the Scopinaro procedure) (43847) or laparoscopic (43645)

The biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) was first reported by Scopinaro, et al, in 1976 as a procedure that combined both gastric restriction and malabsorption.  The technique includes a partial gastrectomy to create a 200-300 cc pouch followed by division and anastomosis of the terminal ileum to the stomach.  The jejunum is totally excluded from digestive continuity with the distal end anastomosed to the terminal ileum, creating a “common channel” of ileum approximately 50 cm from the ileocecal valve.  A high incidence and the severity of complications following BPD have led many surgeons to restrict its use as an operation for the treatment of super obese patients.

  • Long-limb gastric bypass (i.e., > 150cm) (43847) or laparoscopic (43645)

The long-limb gastric bypass differs from the conventional gastric bypass only in the length of defunctionalized jejunum.  The long-limb gastric bypass was designed to induce greater malabsorption by diverting bile and pancreatic secretions distally in the digestive tract.  This was felt to produce a greater malabsorption of fats without the protein malabsorption associated with intestinal bypass.

  • Mini-gastric bypass

A mini-gastric bypass is a variation of the gastric bypass.  Using a laparoscopic approach, the stomach is segmented, similar to a traditional gastric bypass, but instead of creating a Roux-en-Y anastomosis, the jejunum is anastomosed directly to the stomach, similar to a Billroth II procedure.

There is a lack of peer reviewed medical literature that contains comparative data that demonstrates the above mentioned procedures are equivalent to or offer any advantage over the accepted alternatives, particularly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 

  • Vertical banded gastroplasty (43842)
     
    Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is a purely restrictive procedure in which the upper part of the stomach is partitioned by a vertical staple line with a tight outlet wrapped by a prosthetic mesh or band. The small upper stomach pouch is filled quickly by solid food, and prevents consumption of a large meal. Weight loss occurs because of decreased caloric intake of solid food.

    Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) has been replaced largely by other procedures and is rarely performed due to lack of sustained/desired weight loss, as well as the high incidence of complications requiring revision (20 to 56 percent).

Intestinal bypass
The intestinal (e.g., jejunoileal) bypass is created by dividing the small bowel 30 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. The proximal cut end of the small bowel is anastomosed to the terminal ileum 50 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve.  The rest of the small bowel remains a blind loop.

When intestinal bypass surgery is reported, the claim should be processed in accordance with Medical Policy Bulletin G-21 (procedures of questionable current usefulness). 

For information on gastric electrical stimulation/gastric pacing for treatment of obesity, please refer to Medical Policy Bulletin S-155.

Place of Service: Outpatient (Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding)

The following covered procedures are considered for inpatient: Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is typically an outpatient procedure which is only eligible for coverage as an inpatient procedure in special circumstances, including, but not limited to:

  1. Significant cardiac co-morbidity
    • Myocardial infarction
    • Coronary artery disease
    • Congestive heart failure
    • Previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or stent
    • Significant valvular disease
    • Previous valve repair/replacement
    • Abnormal stress test
    • Significant arrhythmia requiring postoperative monitoring
    • Any patient taking digoxin or plavix
  2. Significant pulmonary co-morbidity
    • DVT/PE
    • Emphysema
    • COPD
    • Severe restrictive defect
    • Significant dyspnea on exertion
    • Poorly controlled asthma
  3. Poorly controlled diabetes
  4. Anticoagulant therapy
  5. Known coagulopathy
  6. Diabetic patients with BMI > 60

Description

Obesity is an increase in body weight beyond the limitation of skeletal and physical requirements, as a result of excessive accumulation of fat in the body. In general, 20% to 30% above "ideal" bodyweight, according to standard life insurance tables, constitutes obesity. Morbid obesity is further defined as a condition of consistent and uncontrollable weight gain that is characterized by a weight which is at least 100 lbs. or 100% over ideal weight or a body mass index (BMI) of at least 40 or a BMI of 35 with comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular heart disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus type II, sleep apnea).

Body mass index (BMI) is a method used to quantitatively evaluate body fat by reflecting the presence of excess adipose tissue. BMI is calculated by dividing measured bodyweight in kilograms by the patient's height in meters squared. The normal BMI is 20-25 kg/meters squared.


NOTE:
This policy is designed to address medical guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness, or condition. Each person's unique clinical circumstances may warrant individual consideration, based on review of applicable medical records.

Procedure Codes

100211002243235432364323743238
432394324143253432594364443645
437704377143772437734377443775
438424384343845438464384743848
438864388743888439994700147100
471204712247379S2083  

Traditional (UCR/Fee Schedule) Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

FEP Guidelines

Gastric restrictive procedures, gastric malabsorptive procedures, and combination restrictive and malabsorptive procedures to treat morbid obesity - a condition in which an individual has a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 40 or more, or an individual with a BMI of 35 or more with co-morbidities who has failed conservative treatment; eligible members must be age 18 or over.

NOTE:
Here are some things to keep in mind about surgery for morbid obesity:
  • Prior approval is required for outpatient surgery for morbid obesity.
  • Benefits for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity, performed on an inpatient or outpatient basis, are subject to the following pre-surgical requirements:
    • Diagnosis of morbid obesity for a period of 2 years prior to surgery
    • Participation in a medically supervised weight loss program, including nutritional counseling, for at least 3 months prior to the date of surgery. (Note: Benefits are not available for commercial weight loss programs.)
    • Pre-operative nutritional assessment and nutritional counseling about pre- and post-operative nutrition, eating, and exercise
    • Evidence that attempts at weight loss in the 1 year period prior to surgery have been ineffective
    • Psychological assessment of the member’s ability to understand and adhere to the pre- and post-operative program, performed by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, psychiatric social worker, or psychiatric nurse
    • Patient has not smoked in the 6 months prior to surgery
    • Patient has not been treated for substance abuse for 1 year prior to surgery
  • Benefits for subsequent surgery for morbid obesity, performed on an inpatient or outpatient basis, are subject to the following additional pre-surgical requirements:
    • All criteria listed above for the initial procedure must be met again
    • Previous surgery for morbid obesity was at least 2 years prior to repeat procedure
    • Weight loss from the initial procedure was less than 50% of the member’s excess body weight at the time of the initial procedure
    • Member complied with previously prescribed postoperative nutrition and exercise program
  • Claims for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity must include documentation from the patient’s provider(s) that all pre-surgical requirements have been met

Comprehensive / Wraparound / PPO / Major Medical Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

Any reference in this bulletin to non-billable services by a network provider may not be applicable to Major Medical.

Managed Care (HMO/POS) Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

Publications

Medical Policy Update

02/1993, Obesity
04/2003, Obesity defined
06/2003, Highmark considers laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding investigational
10/2003, Obesity guidelines revised
06/2004, Guidelines on liver biopsy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGI) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) when reported with a bariatric surgical procedure
08/2004, Clarification on patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery
10/2004, Sapala-Wood Micropouch Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
06/2006, Patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery explained
02/2007, Sleeve gastrectomy considered investigational
04/2007, Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding now eligible for reimbursement
10/2008, StomaphyX not covered
02/2010, Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch now eligible for select criteria
02/2010, Bariatric surgery patient selection criteria explained for adults on structured nutrition and exercise program
02/2010, Certain bariatric surgical procedures eligible for adolescents
08/2010, Place of service designations added to some medical policies
02/2011, Sleeve gastrectomy now eligible for select criteria
02/2011, Place of service designation added to seven medical policies
10/2012, Sleeve gastrectomy criteria changed
08/2013, Additional criteria for repeat or revised bariatric surgical procedures
02/2014, Vertical banded gastroplasty considered experimental/investigational

References

Thomas H. Inge, Nancy F. Krebs, Victor F. Garcia. Bariatric Surgery for Severely Overweight Adolescents: Concerns and Recommendations. Pediatrics 2004;114;217.

Ibele I R, MD, Mattar, S G, MD. Adolescent Bariatric Surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America - Volume 91, Issue 6 (December 2011)

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight Obesity in Adults, National Institute of Health 1998

Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 81, No. 5, 10/2001

National Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Medical Policy 7.01.47, Bariatric Surgery, 03/2009

Overview of Bariatric Surgery, Journal of American College of Surgeons, Vol. 194, No. 3, 03/2002

Evidence-Based Medicine: Open and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 16, No. 5, 05/2002

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding at a U.S. Center with up to 3-Year Follow-Up, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 3, 06/2002

Long-Term Data Indicate a Progressive Loss in Efficacy of Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding for the Surgical Treatment of Morbid Obesity, Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 4, 10/2002

Laparoscopic Surgery for Morbid Obesity, Surgical Clinics of North American, Vol. 81, No. 5, 10/2001

Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity, National Institutes of Health, Consensus Development Conference Statement, 03/1991

Malabsorptive Obesity Surgery, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 81, No. 5, 10/2001

Morbid Obesity: the Value of Surgical Intervention, Clinics in Family Practice, Vol. 4, No. 2, 06/2002

Obesity and Its Surgical Management, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 184, No. 2, 08/2002

Medical and Surgical Options in the Treatment of Severe Obesity, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 184, No. 6B, 12/2002

Bariatric Surgery: Creating New Challenges for the Endoscopist, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 57, No. 1, 01/2003

Management of the Bariatric Surgery Patient, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 06/2003

The micropouch gastric bypass: technical considerations in primary and revisionary operations, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 11, No.1, 02/2001

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 1, 02/2005

Weight Loss and Improvement of Obesity-Related Illness in 500 U.S. Patients Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Procedure, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 189, No. 1, 01/2005

Optimal Management of the Morbidly Obese Patient-SAGES Appropriateness Conference Statement, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 18, No. 7, 07/2004

Controversies in Bariatric Surgery:  Evidence-Based Discussions on Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Journal Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 8, No. 4, 05/2004

Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 1, 02/2005

Early Experience with Two-Stage Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as an Alternative in the Super-Super Obese Patient, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 6, 12/2003

Roux-en-Y Divided Gastric Bypass Results in same Weight Loss as Duodenal Switch for Morbid Obesity, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 187, No. 5, 05/2004

A Clinical and Nutritional Comparison of Biliopancreatic Diversion With and Without Duodenal Switch, Annuals of Surgery, Vol. 240, No. 1, 2004

Long Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Revisited, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/2005

Surgical Options for Obesity, Gastroenterology Clinics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 03/2005

Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity:  Health Implications for Patients, Health Professionals, and Third-Party Payers, Journal of the America College of Surgeons, Vol. 200, No. 4, 04/2005

Bariatric Surgical Outcomes, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/2005

National Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center, Vol. 22, No. 2, 06/2005

Nonsurgical and Surgical Treatment of Obesity, Anesthesiology Clinics of North America, Vol. 23, No. 3, 09/2005

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Evolving Clinical Experience, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/2005

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: 1,014 Consecutive Cases, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol., 201, No. 4, 10/2005

Early U.S. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding for Morbid Obesity, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 20, No. 2, 02/2006

Three-Year Follow-Up Weight Loss Results for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding at 1 Major University Medical Center: Does the Weight Loss Persist, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 3, 3/2006

National Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03/2009

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Versus Mini-Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity, Annuals of Surgery, Vol. 242, No. 1, 07/2005

Continued Excellent Results with the Mini-Gastric Bypass: Six-Year Study in 2,410 Patients, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 9, 10/2005

Surgical Revision of Loop (Mini) Gastric Bypass Procedure: Multicenter Review of Complications and Conversions to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01/2007

Long-Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Revisited, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/ 2005

The Malabsorptive Very, Very, Long-Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Super Obesity: Results in 257 Patients, Surgery, Vol.140, No. 4, 10/2006

Weight Gain after Short- and Long-Limb Gastric Bypass in Patients Followed for Longer than 10 Years, Annuals of Surgery, Vol. 244, No. 5, 11/2006

Staged Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a Novel Two-Stage Bariatric Operation as an Alternative in the Super-Obese with Massively Enlarged Liver, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 7, 08/2005

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Initial Weight-Loss Procedure for High-Risk Patients with Morbid Obesity, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 20, No. 6, 06/2006

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (First Stage of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch) on Co-Morbidities in Super-Obese High-Risk Patients”, Obesity Surgery, Vol.16, No. 9, 09/2006

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass versus a Variant of Biliopancreatic Diversion in a Non-Super Obese Population: Prospective Comparison of the Efficacy and the Incidence of Metabolic Deficiencies”, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 16, No 4, 04/2006

Duodenal Switch Provides Superior Weight Loss in the Super Obese (BMI > 50kg/m2) Compared with Gastric Bypass, Annals of Surgery, Vol. 244, No. 4, 10/2006

Frezza EE. Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The future procedure of choice? Surg Today. 2007;37 (4):275-81

Gumbs AA, Gagner M, Dakin G, Pomp A. Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity. Obes Surg. 2007 Jul;17 (7):962-9

Melissas J, Koukouraki S, Askoxylakis J, Stathaki M, Daskalakis M, Perisinakis K, Karkavitsas N. Sleeve gastrectomy: a restrictive procedure? Obes Surg. 2007 Jan; 17 (1):57-62

Trelles N., Gagner, M. Sleeve Gastrectomy. OTGS. September 2007; 9(3); 123-131

Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, Jacobi C, Makarewicz W, Weigand G. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007 Oct; 17 (10):1297-305

Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Indications for sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for weight loss in the morbidly obese. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Apr;12 (4):662-7

Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) in the super-super obese: outcomes in 16 patients. Obes Surg. 2008 Sept; 18(9): 1126-9

Chakhtoura G. Primary results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in a French obesity-surgery specialized university hospital. Obes Surg. 2008 Sept; 18(9): 1130-3

Johnson WH, Fernanadez AZ, Farrell TM, Macdonald KG, Grant JP, McMahon RL, Pryor AD, Wolfe LG, DeMaria EJ. Surgical revision of loop ("mini") gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan; 3(1): 37-41

Pinheiro JS. Long-long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more efficacious in treatment of type 2 diabetes and lipid disorders in super-obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Di. 2008 Jul; 4(4): 521-5

Marceu P, Biron S, Hould F, Lebel S, Marceau S, Lescelleur O, Biertho L, Simard S. Duodenal Switch: Long-Term Results. Obesity Surgery. 2007 Nov; 17(11): 1421-1430

Marceu P, Biron S, Hould F, Lebel S, Marceau S, Lescelleur O, Biertho L, Simard S. Duodenal Switch Improved Standard Biliopancreatic Diversion: Retrospective Study. Surgery for Obesity Related Diseases. 2009 Jan; 5(1): 43-47

Prachand VN. Duodenal Switch Provides Superior Weight Loss in the Super-Obese (BMI > or =) Compared with Gastric Bypass. Ann Surg. 2006 Oct; 244 (4): 611-619

Strain GW, Gagner M, Inabnet, WB, Dakin G, Pomp A. Comparison of Effects of Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch on Weight Loss and Body Composition 1-2 Years After Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan; 3(1): 31-36

Needleman BJ, Happel LC. Bariatric Surgery: Choosing the Optimal Procedure. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2008 Oct; 88(5):991-1007

Xanthakos SA, Daniels SD, Inge TH. Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents: An Update. Adolescent Medicine Clinics. 2006 Oct; 17(3): 589-612

Inge TH. Bariatric Surgery for Pediatric Extreme Obesity: Now or Later? Int J Obes. 2007 Jan; 31(1): 1-14

Tsai WS, Inge TH, Burd RS. Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents – Recent National Trends in Use and In-Hospital Outcome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Mar; 161: 217-221

Elder, KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric Surgery: A Review of Procedures and Outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007 May; (132(6): 2253-3371

Velhote MCP, et al. Bariatric Surgery in Pediatrics-Is It Time? Jour Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jul; 20(7): 751-61

Inge TH. Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery: Methodological Features of the First Prospective Multicenter Study of Adolescent Bariatric Surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Nov; 42(11): 1969-71

Spear BA; Barlow SE; Ervin C; Ludwig DS; Saelens BE; Schetzina KE; Taveras EM. Recommendations for Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec; 120 (Suppl 4): S254-88

Loux TJ, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2008 Jul; 43(7): 1275-1279

Treadwell JR. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bariatric Surgery for Pediatric Obesity. Ann Surg. 2008 Nov; 248(5): 763-76

McGovern L. Clinical Review: Treatment of Pediatric Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Dec; 93(12): 4600-5

Kaufman FR. The Hormone Foundation's: Patient Guide to the Prevention and Management Pediatric Obesity. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008 Dec; 93 (12): 2 p following 4989

Inge TH, Miyano G, Bean J, Helmrath M, Courcoulas A, Harmon CM, Chen MK, Wilson K, Daniels SR, Garcia VF, Brandt ML, Dolan LM. Reversal of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Improvements in Cardiovascular Risk Factors after Surgical Weight Loss in Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan; 123 (1): 214-22

Levitsky LL, et al. Adolescent Obesity and Bariatric Surgery. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity. 2009 Feb; 16(1): 37-44

ASBS Consensus Conference Statement. Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Health Implications for Patients, Health Professionals, and Third-Party Payers in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2004; 1: 371–381

Prevention and Treatment of Pediatric Obesity. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008 Dec;93(12):4576-4599.

Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liaberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean APH, McLean LD. Surgery Decrease Long-Term Mortality, Morbidity and Health Care Use in Morbidly Obese Patients. Annals of Surgery. 2004 Sep;240(3):416-24.

Brethauer SA, Hammel, JP, Schauer PR. Systematic Review of Sleeve Gastrectomy as Staging and Primary Bariatric Procedure. Surg for Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jul;5(4):469-75.

Fuks D. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery. 2009 Jan;145(1):106-13.

Uglioni B. Midterm results of primary vs. secondary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as an isolated operation. Obes Surg. 2009 Apr;19(4):401-6.

Arias E. Mid-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy as a final approach for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009 May;19(5):544-8.

Kakoulidis TP. Initial results with sleeve gastrectomy for patients with class I obesity (BMI 30-35 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jul;5(4):425-8.

Peterli R. Improvement in glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: comparison of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):234-41.

Sánchez-Santos R. Short- and mid-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: the experience of the Spanish National Registry. Obes Surg. 2009 Sep;19(9):1203-10.

Lewis CE. Early experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage bariatric procedure. Am Surg. 2009 Oct; 75(10):945-9.

Ward M, Prachand V. Surgical Treatment of Obesity. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2009 Nov;70(5):985-90.

Fogel R. Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jul; 68(1): 51-8

Overcash WT. Natural Orifice Surgery (NOS) Using StomaphyX for Repair of Gastric Leaks after Bariatric Revisions. Obes Surg. 2008 Jul; 18(7): 882-5

Coté GA. Emerging technology: endoluminal treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Nov; 70(5): 991-9

Stylopoulos N, Aguirre V. Mechanisms of bariatric surgery and implications for the development of endoluminal therapies for obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec; 70(6): 1167-75

Mikami D, Needleman B, Narula V, Durant J, Melvin WS. Natural Orifice Surgery: Initial US Experience Utilizing the StomaphyX Device to Reduce Gastric Pouches after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Surg Endo. 2010 Jan; 24(1): 223-228

Fernández-Esparrach G, Lautz DB, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic anastomotic reduction improves intractable dumping syndrome in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2010 Jan; 6 (1): 36-40

Ryou M. Pilot study evaluating technical feasibility and early outcomes of second-generation endosurgical platform for treatment of weight regain after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis .2009 Jul; 5(4): 450-4

Mullady DK. Treatment of weight regain after gastric bypass surgery when using a new endoscopic platform: initial experience and early outcomes (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep; 70(3): 440-4

Lakdawala MA. Comparison between the results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the Indian population: a retrospective 1 year study. Obes Surg.2010 Jan; 20(1): 1-6

Clinical Issues Committee of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Jan; 6(1): 1-5

Topart P. Should biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch be done as single-stage procedure in patients with BMI > or = 50 kg/m2? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Jan; 6(1): 59-63

Fontana MA, Wohlgemuth SD. The Surgical Treatment of Metabolic Disease and Morbid Obesity. Gastroenterology Clinics. 2010 Mar; 39(1): 125-33

Saber AA. Feasibility of single-access laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in super-super obese patients. Surg Inno. 2010 Mar; 17(1): 36-40

Sammour T. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage bariatric procedure. Obes Surg. 2010 Mar; 20(3): 271-5

Menenakos E. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed with intent to treat morbid obesity: a prospective single-center study of 261 patients with a median follow-up of 1 year. Obes Surg. 2010 Mar; 20(3): 276-82

Foletto M. Sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding or gastroplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Mar; 6(2): 146-51

Todkar JS. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Mar; 6(2): 142-5

Jacobs M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of 1- and 2-year results. Surg Endos. 2010 Apr; 24(4): 781-5

Gehrer S. Fewer nutrient deficiencies after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) than after laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass (LRYGB)-a prospective study. Obes Surg. 2010 Apr; 20(4): 447-53

Abbatini F. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding on type 2 diabetes. Surg Endosc. 2010 May; 24(5): 1005-10

Bohdjalian A. Sleeve Gastrectomy as Sole and Definitive Bariatric Procedure: 5-Year Results for Weight Loss and Ghrelin. Obes Surg. 2010; 20(5): 535-40

Hippens J. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010 Aug; 252(2): 319-24

Watkins BM, Montgomery KF, Ahroni JH, Erlitz MD, Abrams RE, Scurlock JE. Adjustable gastric banding in an ambulatory surgery center. Obes Surg. 2005 Aug;15(7):1045-9.

Watkins BM, Ahroni JH, Michaelson R, Montgomery KF, Abrams RE, Erlitz MD, Scurlock JE. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in an ambulatory surgery center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May;4(3 Suppl): S56-62.

Cobourn C, Mumford D, Chapman MA, Wells L. Laparoscopic gastric banding is safe in outpatient surgical centers. Obes Surg. 2010 April;20(4):415-422.

Raeder J. Bariatric procedures as day/short stay surgery: is it possible and reasonable? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Dec;20(6):508-12.

De Waele B, Lauwers MH, Massaad D, De Vogelaere K, Delvaux G. Outpatient gastroplasty for morbid obesity: our first hundred cases. Obes Surg. 2010 Sept;20(9):1215-8.

De Waele B, Lauwers MH, Massaad D, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Delvaux G. Outpatient laparoscopic gastric banding: initial experience. Obes Surg. 2004 Sept;14(8):1108-1110.

Montgomery KF, Watkins BM, Ahroni JH, Michaelson R, Abrams RE, Erlitz MD, Scurlock JE. Outpatient laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in super-obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007 Jul;17(7):996.

Stefanidis D, Kuwada TS, Gersin KS. The Importance of the Length of the Limbs for Gastric Bypass Patients-An Evidence-Based Review. Obesity Surgery. 2011;21(1):119-124.

Odstrcil EA, Martinez JG, Santa Anaa CA, et al. The contribution of malabsorption to the reduction in net energy absorption after long-limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct;92(4):704-13.

Crea N. Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion with or without gastric preservation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011 Feb;21(2):139-45.

Fontna MA, Wohlgemuth SD. The Surgical Treatment of Metabolic Disease and Morbid Obesity. Gastroentrol Clin North Am. 2010 Mar:39(1):125-33.

Geerts A, Darius T, Chapelle T, et al. The multicenter Belgian survey on liver transplantation for hepatic failure after bariatric surgery. Transplant Proc. 2010 Dec;42(10):4395-8.

The Influence of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Metabolic Syndrome Parameters in Obese Patients in Own Material. Obesity Surgery. 2012 Jan;22(1):13-22.

Early Postoperative Outcomes and Medication Cost Savings after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. J Obes. 2011 Dec;350523.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy is a Safe and Effective Bariatric Procedure for the Lower BMI (35.0–43.0 kg/m2). Population Obes Surg. 2011 August;21(8):1168-1171.

International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of 12,000 cases. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 8 (2012):8-19.

Alexandrou A, Felekouras E, Giannopoulos A et al. What is the Actual Fate of Super-Morbid-Obese Patients Who Undergo Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as the First Step of a Two-Stage Weight-Reduction Operative Strategy? Obes Surg 2012.

Appel LJ, Clark JM, Yeh HC, Wang NY, Coughlin JW, Daumit G, et al. Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1959-68. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Boza C, Viscido G, Salinas J, Crovari F, Funke R, Perez G. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese adolescents: results in 51 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Mar;8(2):133-7. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE, et al. Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy in Obese Patients with Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 26. [Epub ahead of print]

Wadden TA, Volger S, Sarwer DB, Vetter ML, Tsai AG, Berkowitz RI, et al. A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1969-79. Epub 2011 Nov 14.

Nakade M, Aiba N, Suda N, et al. Behavioral change during weight loss program and one-year follow-up: Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP) in Japan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2012;21(1):22-34.

Anderson JW, Reynolds LR, Bush HM, et al. Effect of a behavioral/nutritional intervention program on weight loss in obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. Postgrad Med. 2011 Sep;123(5):205-13.

Vasas P, Dillemans B, Van Cauwenberge S, et al. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Converted to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg. 2012 Nov 16. [Epub ahead of print]

Apers JA, Wens C, van Vlodrop V, et al. Perioperative outcomes of revisional laparoscopic gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding and after vertical banded gastroplasty: experience with 107 cases and subgroup analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep 26. [Epub ahead of print]

Shayani V, Voellinger D, Liu C, et al. Safety and efficacy of the LAP-BAND AP® adjustable gastric band in the treatment of obesity: results at 2 years. Postgrad Med. 2012 Jul;124(4):181-8.

Suter M, Ralea S, Millo P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: a multicenter experience with 203 patients. Obes Surg. 2012 Oct;22(10):1554-61.

Avriel A, Warner E, Avinoach E, et al. Major respiratory adverse events after laparascopic gastric banding surgery for morbid obesity. Respir Med. 2012 Aug;106(8):1192-8.

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery

American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)  Practice Parameters for the Medical Therapy of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)

Thompson CC, Chand B, Chen YK, et al. Endoscopic Suturing for Transoral Outlet Reduction Increases Weight Loss Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery. Gastroenterology. 2013 Apr 5.

Goyal V, Holover S, Garber S. et al. Gastric pouch reduction using StomaphyX™ in post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients does not result in sustained weight loss: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar 22.

Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi M, Alamri H, et al. Laparoscopic Removal of Poor Outcome Gastric Banding with Concomitant Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013 Mar 6.

Moszkowicz D, Arienzo R, Khettab I, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy severe complications: is it always a reasonable surgical option? Obes Surg. 2013 May;23(5):676-86.

O'Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):87-94.

Ee E, Nottle PD. Outcomes of revision laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective study. ANZ J Surg. 2012 Dec 10.

Vijgen GH, Schouten R, Bouvy ND, et al. Salvage banding for failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;8(6):803-8.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Consensus Statement

Koeck E, Davenport K, Barefoot LC, et al. Inpatient weight loss as a precursor to bariatric surgery for adolescents with extreme obesity: optimizing bariatric surgery. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013 Jul;52(7):608-11.

Leeman MF, Ward C, Duxbury M, et al. The Intra-gastric Balloon for Pre-operative Weight Loss in Bariatric Surgery: Is it Worthwhile? Obes Surg. 2013 Aug;23(8):1262-5.

Ochner CN, Dambkowski CL, Yeomans BL, et al. Pre-bariatric surgery weight loss requirements and the effect of preoperative weight loss on postoperative outcome. International Journal of Obesity 2012; 36(11): 1380-1387.

ASMBS Position Statement on Preoperative Supervised Weight Loss Requirement. Approved by the Executive Council on February 26, 2011 (Clinical Issues Committee). Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 7 (2011) 257–260.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Consensus Statement

Thompson CC, Chand B, Chen YK, et al. Endoscopic Suturing for Transoral Outlet Reduction Increases Weight Loss Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery. Gastroenterology. 2013 Apr 5.

Goyal V, Holover S, Garber S. et al. Gastric pouch reduction using StomaphyX™ in post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients does not result in sustained weight loss: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar 22.

Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi M, Alamri H, et al. Laparoscopic Removal of Poor Outcome Gastric Banding with Concomitant Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013 Mar 6.

Moszkowicz D, Arienzo R, Khettab I, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy severe complications: is it always a reasonable surgical option? Obes Surg. 2013 May;23(5):676-86.

O'Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):87-94.


Ee E, Nottle PD. Outcomes of revision laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective study. ANZ J Surg. 2012 Dec 10.

Vijgen GH, Schouten R, Bouvy ND, et al. Salvage banding for failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;8(6):803-8.

Michalsky M, Reichard K, Inge T, et al. ASMBS pediatric committee best practice guidelines. Surg for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2011. http://asmbs.org/document/26-pediatric-committee-best-practice-guidelines/file. Accessed January 6, 2014.

Vasas P, Dillemans B, Van Cauwenberge S, et al.  Short and long term outcomes of vertical banded gastroplasty converted to roux-en-y gastric bypass. Springer Sci Bus Media NY. 2012.
http://www.dillemans.be/frontend/files/userfiles/files/Vasas_ObesSurg.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2014.

Gastroplasties. Up-to-date. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/bariatric-surgical-operations-for-the-management-of-severe-obesity-descriptions?source=preview&anchor=H16057018&selectedTitle=1~132#H16057018. Accessed January 6, 2014.

Neff KJ , Olbers T, le Roux CW. Bariatric surgery: the challenges with candidate selection, individualizing treatment and clinical outcomes. BMC Med. 2013;11:8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570360/. Accessed January 6, 2014.

Higa K. Vertical-band Gastroplasty To Rouxen-Y gastric bypass with remnant gastrectomy. Bariatric Times. 2013 May.  http://bariatrictimes.com/vertical-banded-gastroplasty-to-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-with-remnant-gastrectomy/. Accessed January 6, 2014.

View Previous Versions

[Version 041 of G-24]
[Version 040 of G-24]
[Version 039 of G-24]
[Version 038 of G-24]
[Version 037 of G-24]
[Version 036 of G-24]
[Version 035 of G-24]
[Version 034 of G-24]
[Version 033 of G-24]
[Version 032 of G-24]
[Version 031 of G-24]
[Version 030 of G-24]
[Version 029 of G-24]
[Version 028 of G-24]
[Version 027 of G-24]
[Version 026 of G-24]
[Version 025 of G-24]
[Version 024 of G-24]
[Version 023 of G-24]
[Version 022 of G-24]
[Version 021 of G-24]
[Version 020 of G-24]
[Version 019 of G-24]
[Version 018 of G-24]
[Version 017 of G-24]
[Version 016 of G-24]
[Version 015 of G-24]
[Version 014 of G-24]
[Version 013 of G-24]
[Version 012 of G-24]
[Version 011 of G-24]
[Version 010 of G-24]
[Version 009 of G-24]
[Version 008 of G-24]
[Version 007 of G-24]
[Version 006 of G-24]
[Version 005 of G-24]
[Version 004 of G-24]
[Version 003 of G-24]
[Version 002 of G-24]
[Version 001 of G-24]

Table Attachment

Text Attachment

Procedure Code Attachments

Diagnosis Codes

ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes

Covered Diagnosis Codes

Applicable to procedure codes 43644, 43770-43774, 43843, 43846, 43848, 43886-43888

278.01V85.35V85.36V85.37
V85.38V85.39V85.41V85.42
V85.43V85.44V85.45 

Covered Diagnosis Codes

Applicable to procedure codes 43775, 43845

278.01V85.43V85.44V85.45

Non-covered Diagnosis Codes

278.00   

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes

Covered Diagnosis Codes

Applicable to procedure codes 43644, 43770-43774, 43843, 43846, 43848, 43886-43888

E66.01Z68.35Z68.36Z68.37
Z68.38Z68.39Z68.41Z68.42
Z68.43Z68.44Z68.45 

Covered Diagnosis Codes

Applicable to procedure codes 43775, 43845

E66.01Z68.43Z68.44Z68.45

Non-covered Diagnosis Codes

E66.09E66.1E66.8E66.9

Glossary





Medical policies do not constitute medical advice, nor are they intended to govern the practice of medicine. They are intended to reflect Highmark's reimbursement and coverage guidelines. Coverage for services may vary for individual members, based on the terms of the benefit contract.

Highmark retains the right to review and update its medical policy guidelines at its sole discretion. These guidelines are the proprietary information of Highmark. Any sale, copying or dissemination of the medical policies is prohibited; however, limited copying of medical policies is permitted for individual use.



back to top