Medical Treatment

Treatment of obesity is excluded from medical coverage.  However, covered services for the medical treatment for morbid obesity are eligible for reimbursement.  Coverage for the medical treatment of morbid obesity is determined according to individual or group customer benefits.

Surgical Treatment

There are a variety of surgeries intended for the treatment of morbid obesity.  All procedures fall into one of these two categories:

1. Gastric restrictive surgical procedures (e.g., vertical banded gastroplasty, gastric stapling, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, mini-gastric bypass, gastric bypass with Roux-en-Y) create a small gastric pouch, resulting in weight loss from early satiety and decreased dietary intake.  The decreased capacity of the stomach reduces the volume of food an individual consumes before feeling full.
2. Malabsorptive surgical procedures (e. g., biliopancreatic diversion, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, long-limb gastric bypass, intestinal gastric bypass) bypass a section of the small intestines.  Weight loss results from intestinal malabsorption without dietary modification.

The following procedures are covered for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity when all of the patient selection criteria are met.  (Note:  Coverage for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity is determined according to individual or group customer benefits.)

• Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using an FDA-approved adjustable gastric band (43770)
  
  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding involves creating a gastric pouch by placing a gastric band around the exterior of the stomach.  The band is attached to a reservoir that is implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal fascia in the patient’s upper abdomen.  Injecting the reservoir with saline will alter the diameter of the gastric band.  This limits food consumption and creates an earlier feeling of fullness.  Subsequent adjustments can be made either to tighten or loosen the band to meet individual patient needs.

NOTE:

Currently, the adjustable gastric band is not FDA approved for patients less than 18 years of age. The FDA premarket approval for the LAP-BAND System indicates it is for use only in severely obese adult patients. (The clinical study that was submitted to the FDA for approval of the LAP-BAND was restricted to adults, ages 18–55 years.) 

• Biliopancreatic bypass with duodenal switch (43845) for members with a BMI of 50 kg/m2 or greater
  
  The biliopancreatic bypass with duodenal switch is a modification of the biliopancreatic bypass.  The most significant difference from the biliopancreatic bypass to the duodenal switch procedure is utilization of a sleeve gastrectomy of the greater curvature rather than a distal gastrectomy and anastomosis of the ileum to the duodenum instead of the stomach.
  
  
• Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RY-GBP) {open (43846) or laparoscopic (43644)}

  The open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered the gold standard for bariatric surgery.  A small (30 cc) proximal gastric pouch is constructed which is then divided from the remainder of the stomach just below the cardia with a short (150 cm or less) Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy performed between the proximal gastric pouch and a Roux-en-Y jejunal limb.

• Vertical banded gastroplasty (43842) and gastric stapling (open) ( 43843)
  
  Note: Code 43843 is not limited to gastric stapling.
  
  Vertical banded gastroplasty is a type of gastric restrictive procedure, which consists of constructing a small pouch with a restricted outlet along the lesser curvature of the stomach.  The outlet may be externally reinforced to prevent disruption or dilation.
  
  Gastric stapling is accomplished by stapling the upper stomach to create a small pouch into which food flows after it’s swallowed.  The outlet of this pouch is restricted by a band of synthetic mesh, which slows its emptying, so that the person feels full after only a few bites of food.

Patient Selection Criteria for Adults

1. The patient is morbidly obese;
   
   Morbid obesity is defined as a condition of consistent and uncontrollable weight gain that is characterized by a weight which is at least 100 lbs. or 100% over ideal weight or a BMI of at least 40 or a BMI of 35 with comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular heart disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus type II, sleep apnea).
   
   
2. The patient is at least 18 years old; and
   
   
3. The patient has received non-surgical treatment (e.g., dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, exercise program, and behavior modification) and attempts at weight loss have failed.
   
   
4. The patient must participate in and meet the criteria of a structured nutrition and exercise program.  This includes dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, increased physical activity, behavioral modification, and/or pharmacologic therapy, documented in the medical record.  This structured nutrition and exercise program must meet all of the following criteria:
   
   
   • The nutrition and exercise program must be supervised and monitored by a physician working in cooperation with dieticians and/or nutritionists; and
   • The nutrition and exercise program(s) must total 6 visits or more during a period of six consecutive months; and
   • The nutritional and exercise program must occur within two years prior to the surgery; and
   • The patient's participation in a structured nutrition and exercise program must be documented in the medical record by an attending physician who supervised the patient's progress.  A physician's summary letter is not sufficient documentation.  Documentation should include medical records of the physician's on-going assessments of the patient's progress throughout the course of the nutrition and exercise program.  For patients who participate in a structured nutrition and exercise program, medical records documenting the patient's participation and progress must be available for review.
     
     
5. The patient must complete a psychological evaluation performed by a licensed mental health care professional and be recommended for bariatric surgery.  The patient's medical record documentation should indicate that all psychosocial issues have been identified and addressed.
   
   
6. Patient selection is a critical process requiring psychiatric evaluation and a multidisciplinary team approach.  The member's understanding of the procedure, and ability to participate and comply with life-long follow-up and the life-style changes (e.g., changes in dietary habits, and beginning an exercise program) are necessary to the success of the procedure.

If the patient does not meet all of the patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery, the procedure will be denied as not medically necessary.

Patient Selection Criteria for Adolescents

The eligible bariatric surgical procedures listed above are covered for members under the age of 18 years when they meet all of the following patient selection criteria:

1. Attainment or near-attainment of physiologic/skeletal maturity at approximately, age 13 in girls and 15 for boys (The patient has attained Tanner 4 pubertal development and final or near-final adult height (e.g., ≥ 95 %) of adult stature).
   
   
2. The patient is morbidly obese defined as a BMI of > 50 or severely obese defined as a BMI > 40 with serious comorbidities:
   
   

   • Life threatening cardiopulmonary problems such as severe obstructive sleep apnea, Pickwickian syndrome, obesity related cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, documented coronary artery disease
   • Pseudomotor cerebri
   • Type II Diabetes
     
     
3. The patient has received non-surgical treatment (e.g., dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, exercise program, and behavior modification) and attempts at weight loss have failed.
   
   
4. The patient must participate in and meet the criteria of a structured nutrition and exercise program. This includes dietitian/nutritionist consultation, low calorie diet, increased physical activity, behavioral modification, and/or pharmacologic therapy, documented in the medical record. This structured nutrition and exercise program must meet all of the following criteria:
   
   
   • The nutrition and exercise program must be supervised and monitored by a physician working in cooperation with dieticians and/or nutritionists; and
   • The nutrition and exercise program(s) must total 6 visits or more during a period of six consecutive months; and
   • The nutritional and exercise program must occur within two years prior to the surgery; and
   • The patient's participation in a structured nutrition and exercise program must be documented in the medical record by an attending physician who supervised the patient's progress. A physician's summary letter is not sufficient documentation. Documentation should include medical records of the physician's on-going assessments of the patient's progress throughout the course of the nutrition and exercise program. For patients who participate in a structured nutrition and exercise program, medical records documenting the patient's participation and progress must be available for review.
     
     
5. The patient must complete a psychological evaluation performed by a licensed mental health care professional and be recommended for bariatric surgery.  The patient's medical record documentation should indicate that all psychosocial issues have been identified and addressed.
   
   
6. The patient must be able to show decisional capacity and maturity in the psychological evaluation and provide informed assent for surgical management.
   
   
7. The patient must be capable and willing to adhere to nutritional guidelines postoperatively.
   
   
8. The patient must have a supportive and committed family environment.
   
   
9. Patient selection is a critical process requiring psychiatric evaluation and a multidisciplinary team approach. The member's understanding of the procedure and ability to participate and comply with life-long follow-up and the life-style changes (e.g., changes in dietary habits, and beginning an exercise program) are necessary to the success of the procedure.

If the patient does not meet all of the patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery, the procedure will be denied as not medically necessary.

Gastric stapling and gastric bypass surgery reported for the treatment of "morbid obesity" should be processed under the appropriate procedure code 43644, 43842, 43843, 43846, or 43848 respectively.  Claims for "vertical banded gastroplasty" should be processed under code 43842.  (See Medical Policy Bulletin S-96 for additional information on laparoscopic surgery.)

In addition, itemized charges reported for gastroduodenostomy and/or surgery should be combined with the stapling, vertical banded gastroplasty or bypass surgery.  The gastrojejunostomy in conjunction with gastric stapling, vertical banded gastroplasty or gastric bypass claim should be processed under the appropriate code 43644, 43842, 43843, 43846, or 43848.  Modifier 59 may be reported with a non-E/M service, to identify it as distinct or independent from other non-E/M services performed on the same day.  When modifier 59 is reported, the patient’s records must support its use in accordance with CPT guidelines.

A liver biopsy (10021, 10022, 47001, 47100, 47120, 47122, and 47379), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (43234-43239, 43241, and 43259) are considered an inherent part of all bariatric surgical procedures (43644, 43645, 43770-43775, 43842-43848, 43886-43888, and S2083).  These services are not eligible for separate payment when reported on the same day as a bariatric surgical procedure.  When a doctor reports a liver biopsy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy  or EGD with a bariatric surgical procedure, the charges should be combined under the appropriate bariatric surgery procedure code.  A participating, preferred, or network provider cannot bill the member for the liver biopsy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, or EGD.  Modifier 59 may be reported with a non-E/M service, to identify it as distinct or independent from other non-E/M services performed on the same day.  When modifier 59 is reported, the patient’s records must support its use in accordance with CPT guidelines.

Repeat or Revised Bariatric Surgical Procedures (43771-43774, 43848, and 43886-43888)

• Conversion of a gastric restrictive procedure without gastric bypass (e.g., laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, or vertical banded gastroplasty) to a gastric restrictive procedure with gastric bypass (e.g., for morbid obesity)
  
  
• Revision of a failed gastric restrictive procedure (e.g., restapling of dehisced vertical banded gastroplasty staple line, severe adhesions of the gastric pouch, stenosis of stoma, dilation of stoma)
  
  A Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (43644, 43846) may be considered medically necessary for patients who have not had adequate weight loss (defined as loss of more than 50 percent of excess body weight) from the primary bariatric surgery (e.g., laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (43770), vertical banded gastroplasty (43842).  Since, maximal weight loss is not typically achieved until 1 to 2 years of the primary bariatric surgery (e.g., laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, or vertical banded gastroplasty), a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered not medically necessary and not covered if performed within two years of the primary bariatric surgery.  In addition, a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or vertical banded gastroplasty is considered not medically necessary and not covered for patients who have been substantially noncompliant with a prescribed nutrition and exercise program following the primary bariatric surgery.  More than one laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, vertical banded gastroplasty or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure is considered not medically necessary.
  
  Reoperation may be required to either “take-down” or revise the original bariatric procedure.  Surgical revision or reversal (i.e., take-down) is covered for members who have complications from the primary procedure demonstrated by diagnostic study (e.g., obstruction, stricture, dilation of the gastric pouch).  A reoperation or reversal is considered not medically necessary unless the primary bariatric surgery has resulted in complications, and therefore, it is not covered.  (See Medical Policy Bulletin Z-35 for additional information on repeat surgical procedures.)
  
  Codes 43771-43774, 43886-43888 represent open or laparoscopic revisions, repairs or removal of the components of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.  These procedures would be indicated if there was a complication (e.g., infection in the area of the subcutaneous port).

Services that do not meet the medical necessity guidelines outlined in this policy will be considered not medically necessary. A participating, preferred or network provider cannot bill the member for the denied service unless the provider has given advance written notice, informing the member that the service may be deemed not medically necessary and providing an estimate of the cost.  The member must agree in writing to assume financial responsibility, in advance of receiving the service.  The signed agreement should be maintained in the provider's records.

Endoscopic procedures (43999) (e.g., insertion of the StomaphyX™ device) to treat weight gain after bariatric surgery to remedy large gastric stoma or large gastric pouches are considered experimental/investigational. Well-designed large population, multicenter, controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed. A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for the denied service. The StomaphyX™ device was approved in March 2007 by the FDA through the 510(k) process. It is being used in endoluminal transoral tissue approximation and ligation in the gastrointestinal tract.

The StomaphyX device is also used in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. See Medical Policy Bulletin S-145 for information on endoscopic/endoluminal gastroplasty or gastroplication with suturing of the esophagogastric junction in the treatment of GERD.

Date Last Reviewed: 05/2008

The following procedures are considered experimental/investigational, and therefore, they are not covered.  A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for the non-covered service.

• Biliopancreatic bypass (the Scopinaro procedure) (43847) or laparoscopic (43645)

The biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) was first reported by Scopinaro, et al, in 1976 as a procedure that combined both gastric restriction and malabsorption.  The technique includes a partial gastrectomy to create a 200-300 cc pouch followed by division and anastomosis of the terminal ileum to the stomach.  The jejunum is totally excluded from digestive continuity with the distal end anastomosed to the terminal ileum, creating a “common channel” of ileum approximately 50 cm from the ileocecal valve.  A high incidence and the severity of complications following BPD have led many surgeons to restrict its use as an operation for the treatment of super obese patients.

Date Last Reviewed:  08/2009

• Long-limb gastric bypass (i.e., > 150cm) (43847) or laparoscopic (43645)

The long-limb gastric bypass differs from the conventional gastric bypass only in the length of defunctionalized jejunum.  The long-limb gastric bypass was designed to induce greater malabsorption by diverting bile and pancreatic secretions distally in the digestive tract.  This was felt to produce a greater malabsorption of fats without the protein malabsorption associated with intestinal bypass.

Date Last Reviewed:  06/2009

• Mini-gastric bypass

A mini-gastric bypass is a variation of the gastric bypass.  Using a laparoscopic approach, the stomach is segmented, similar to a traditional gastric bypass, but instead of creating a Roux-en-Y anastomosis, the jejunum is anastomosed directly to the stomach, similar to a Billroth II procedure.

Date Last Reviewed:  06/2009

• Sleeve Gastrectomy (43775)

A sleeve gastrectomy is an alternative approach to gastrectomy that can be performed on its own, or in combination with malabsorptive procedures (most commonly biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch). In this procedure, the greater curvature of the stomach is resected from the angle of His to the distal antrum, resulting in a stomach remnant shaped like a tube or sleeve. The pyloric sphincter is preserved, resulting in a more physiologic transit of food from the stomach to the duodenum, and avoiding the dumping syndrome (overly rapid transport of food through stomach into intestines) that is seen with distal gastrectomy. This procedure is relatively simple to perform, and can be done by the open or laparoscopic technique. Some surgeons have proposed this as the first in a 2-stage procedure for very high-risk patients.

Date Last Reviewed: 02/2010

• Two-Staged Procedure for Morbid Obesity

In the two-staged procedure, the greater curve of the stomach is removed in the initial procedure, and then a Roux-en-Y technique is used to anastomose the small bowel to the stomach remnant.  Bariatric procedures are usually completed in one operative procedure.  At this time, multi-staged bariatric procedures are considered experimental/investigational.

Date Last Reviewed:  09/2008

There is a lack of peer reviewed medical literature that contains comparative data that demonstrates the above mentioned procedures are equivalent to or offer any advantage over the accepted alternatives, particularly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 

Intestinal bypass

The intestinal (e.g., jejunoileal) bypass is created by dividing the small bowel 30 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz.  The proximal cut end of the small bowel is anastomosed to the terminal ileum 50 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve.  The rest of the small bowel remains a blind loop.

When intestinal bypass surgery is reported, the claim should be processed in accordance with Medical Policy Bulletin G-21 (procedures of questionable current usefulness). 

For information on gastric electrical stimulation/gastric pacing for treatment of obesity, please refer to Medical Policy Bulletin S-155.

Description

Obesity is an increase in body weight beyond the limitation of skeletal and physical requirements, as a result of excessive accumulation of fat in the body. In general, 20% to 30% above "ideal" bodyweight, according to standard life insurance tables, constitutes obesity. Morbid obesity is further defined as a condition of consistent and uncontrollable weight gain that is characterized by a weight which is at least 100 lbs. or 100% over ideal weight or a body mass index (BMI) of at least 40 or a BMI of 35 with comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular heart disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus type II, sleep apnea).

Body mass index (BMI) is a method used to quantitatively evaluate body fat by reflecting the presence of excess adipose tissue. BMI is calculated by dividing measured bodyweight in kilograms by the patient's height in meters squared. The normal BMI is 20-25 kg/meters squared.

NOTE:

This policy is designed to address medical guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness, or condition. Each person's unique clinical circumstances may warrant individual consideration, based on review of applicable medical records.

FEP will cover gastric restrictive procedures, gastric malabsorptive procedures, and combination restrictive and malabsorptive procedures to treat morbid obesity.  Morbid obesity is described as a condition in which an individual has a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 40 or more, or an individual with a BMI of 35 or more with co-morbidities who has failed conservative treatment.  All eligible members must be age 18 years or over. 

Benefits are also available for diagnostic studies and a psychological examination performed prior to the procedure to determine if the patient is a candidate for the procedure. 

PRN References

02/1993, Obesity
04/2003, Obesity defined
06/2003, Highmark considers laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding investigational
10/2003, Obesity guidelines revised
06/2004, Guidelines on liver biopsy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGI) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) when reported with a bariatric surgical procedure
08/2004, Clarification on patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery
10/2004, Sapala-Wood Micropouch Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
06/2006, Patient selection criteria for bariatric surgery explained
02/2007, Sleeve gastrectomy considered investigational
04/2007, Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding now eligible for reimbursement
10/2008, StomaphyX not covered
02/2010, Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch now eligible for select criteria
02/2010, Bariatric surgery patient selection criteria explained for adults on structured nutrition and exercise program
02/2010, Certain bariatric surgical procedures eligible for adolescents

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight Obesity in Adults, National Institute of Health 1998

Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 81, No. 5, 10/2001

National Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Medical Policy 7.01.47, Bariatric Surgery, 03/2009

Overview of Bariatric Surgery, Journal of American College of Surgeons, Vol. 194, No. 3, 03/2002

Evidence-Based Medicine: Open and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 16, No. 5, 05/2002

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding at a U.S. Center with up to 3-Year Follow-Up, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 3, 06/2002

Long-Term Data Indicate a Progressive Loss in Efficacy of Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding for the Surgical Treatment of Morbid Obesity, Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 4, 10/2002

Laparoscopic Surgery for Morbid Obesity, Surgical Clinics of North American, Vol. 81, No. 5, 10/2001

Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity, National Institutes of Health, Consensus Development Conference Statement, 03/1991

Malabsorptive Obesity Surgery, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 81, No. 5, 10/2001

Morbid Obesity: the Value of Surgical Intervention, Clinics in Family Practice, Vol. 4, No. 2, 06/2002

Obesity and Its Surgical Management, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 184, No. 2, 08/2002

Medical and Surgical Options in the Treatment of Severe Obesity, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 184, No. 6B, 12/2002

Bariatric Surgery: Creating New Challenges for the Endoscopist, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 57, No. 1, 01/2003

Management of the Bariatric Surgery Patient, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 06/2003

The micropouch gastric bypass: technical considerations in primary and revisionary operations, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 11, No.1, 02/2001

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 1, 02/2005

Weight Loss and Improvement of Obesity-Related Illness in 500 U.S. Patients Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Procedure, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 189, No. 1, 01/2005

Optimal Management of the Morbidly Obese Patient-SAGES Appropriateness Conference Statement, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 18, No. 7, 07/2004

Controversies in Bariatric Surgery:  Evidence-Based Discussions on Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Journal Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 8, No. 4, 05/2004

Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 1, 02/2005

Early Experience with Two-Stage Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as an Alternative in the Super-Super Obese Patient, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 6, 12/2003

Roux-en-Y Divided Gastric Bypass Results in same Weight Loss as Duodenal Switch for Morbid Obesity, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 187, No. 5, 05/2004

A Clinical and Nutritional Comparison of Biliopancreatic Diversion With and Without Duodenal Switch, Annuals of Surgery, Vol. 240, No. 1, 2004

Long Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Revisited, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/2005

Surgical Options for Obesity, Gastroenterology Clinics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 03/2005

Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity:  Health Implications for Patients, Health Professionals, and Third-Party Payers, Journal of the America College of Surgeons, Vol. 200, No. 4, 04/2005

Bariatric Surgical Outcomes, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/2005

National Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center, Vol. 22, No. 2, 06/2005

Nonsurgical and Surgical Treatment of Obesity, Anesthesiology Clinics of North America, Vol. 23, No. 3, 09/2005

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Evolving Clinical Experience, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/2005

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: 1,014 Consecutive Cases, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol., 201, No. 4, 10/2005

Early U.S. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding for Morbid Obesity, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 20, No. 2, 02/2006

Three-Year Follow-Up Weight Loss Results for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding at 1 Major University Medical Center: Does the Weight Loss Persist, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 3, 3/2006

National Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03/2009

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Versus Mini-Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity, Annuals of Surgery, Vol. 242, No. 1, 07/2005

Continued Excellent Results with the Mini-Gastric Bypass: Six-Year Study in 2,410 Patients, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 9, 10/2005

Surgical Revision of Loop (Mini) Gastric Bypass Procedure: Multicenter Review of Complications and Conversions to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01/2007

Long-Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Revisited, Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 4, 08/ 2005

The Malabsorptive Very, Very, Long-Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Super Obesity: Results in 257 Patients, Surgery, Vol.140, No. 4, 10/2006

Weight Gain after Short- and Long-Limb Gastric Bypass in Patients Followed for Longer than 10 Years, Annuals of Surgery, Vol. 244, No. 5, 11/2006

Staged Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a Novel Two-Stage Bariatric Operation as an Alternative in the Super-Obese with Massively Enlarged Liver, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 7, 08/2005

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Initial Weight-Loss Procedure for High-Risk Patients with Morbid Obesity, Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 20, No. 6, 06/2006

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (First Stage of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch) on Co-Morbidities in Super-Obese High-Risk Patients”, Obesity Surgery, Vol.16, No. 9, 09/2006

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass versus a Variant of Biliopancreatic Diversion in a Non-Super Obese Population: Prospective Comparison of the Efficacy and the Incidence of Metabolic Deficiencies”, Obesity Surgery, Vol. 16, No 4, 04/2006

Duodenal Switch Provides Superior Weight Loss in the Super Obese (BMI > 50kg/m2) Compared with Gastric Bypass, Annals of Surgery, Vol. 244, No. 4, 10/2006

Frezza EE. Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The future procedure of choice? Surg Today. 2007;37 (4):275-81

Gumbs AA, Gagner M, Dakin G, Pomp A. Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity. Obes Surg. 2007 Jul;17 (7):962-9

Melissas J, Koukouraki S, Askoxylakis J, Stathaki M, Daskalakis M, Perisinakis K, Karkavitsas N. Sleeve gastrectomy: a restrictive procedure? Obes Surg. 2007 Jan; 17 (1):57-62

Trelles N., Gagner, M. Sleeve Gastrectomy. OTGS. September 2007; 9(3); 123-131

Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, Jacobi C, Makarewicz W, Weigand G. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007 Oct; 17 (10):1297-305

Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Indications for sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for weight loss in the morbidly obese. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Apr;12 (4):662-7

Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) in the super-super obese: outcomes in 16 patients. Obes Surg. 2008 Sept; 18(9): 1126-9

Chakhtoura G. Primary results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in a French obesity-surgery specialized university hospital. Obes Surg. 2008 Sept; 18(9): 1130-3

Johnson WH, Fernanadez AZ, Farrell TM, Macdonald KG, Grant JP, McMahon RL, Pryor AD, Wolfe LG, DeMaria EJ. Surgical revision of loop ("mini") gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan; 3(1): 37-41

Pinheiro JS. Long-long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more efficacious in treatment of type 2 diabetes and lipid disorders in super-obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Di. 2008 Jul; 4(4): 521-5

Marceu P, Biron S, Hould F, Lebel S, Marceau S, Lescelleur O, Biertho L, Simard S. Duodenal Switch: Long-Term Results. Obesity Surgery. 2007 Nov; 17(11): 1421-1430

Marceu P, Biron S, Hould F, Lebel S, Marceau S, Lescelleur O, Biertho L, Simard S. Duodenal Switch Improved Standard Biliopancreatic Diversion: Retrospective Study. Surgery for Obesity Related Diseases. 2009 Jan; 5(1): 43-47

Prachand VN. Duodenal Switch Provides Superior Weight Loss in the Super-Obese (BMI > or =) Compared with Gastric Bypass. Ann Surg. 2006 Oct; 244 (4): 611-619

Strain GW, Gagner M, Inabnet, WB, Dakin G, Pomp A. Comparison of Effects of Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch on Weight Loss and Body Composition 1-2 Years After Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan; 3(1): 31-36

Needleman BJ, Happel LC. Bariatric Surgery: Choosing the Optimal Procedure. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2008 Oct; 88(5):991-1007

Xanthakos SA, Daniels SD, Inge TH. Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents: An Update. Adolescent Medicine Clinics. 2006 Oct; 17(3): 589-612

Inge TH. Bariatric Surgery for Pediatric Extreme Obesity: Now or Later? Int J Obes. 2007 Jan; 31(1): 1-14

Tsai WS, Inge TH, Burd RS. Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents – Recent National Trends in Use and In-Hospital Outcome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Mar; 161: 217-221

Elder, KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric Surgery: A Review of Procedures and Outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007 May; (132(6): 2253-3371

Velhote MCP, et al. Bariatric Surgery in Pediatrics-Is It Time? Jour Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jul; 20(7): 751-61

Inge TH. Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery: Methodological Features of the First Prospective Multicenter Study of Adolescent Bariatric Surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Nov; 42(11): 1969-71

Spear BA; Barlow SE; Ervin C; Ludwig DS; Saelens BE; Schetzina KE; Taveras EM. Recommendations for Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec; 120 (Suppl 4): S254-88

Loux TJ, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2008 Jul; 43(7): 1275-1279

Treadwell JR. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bariatric Surgery for Pediatric Obesity. Ann Surg. 2008 Nov; 248(5): 763-76

McGovern L. Clinical Review: Treatment of Pediatric Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Dec; 93(12): 4600-5

Kaufman FR. The Hormone Foundation's: Patient Guide to the Prevention and Management Pediatric Obesity. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008 Dec; 93 (12): 2 p following 4989

Inge TH, Miyano G, Bean J, Helmrath M, Courcoulas A, Harmon CM, Chen MK, Wilson K, Daniels SR, Garcia VF, Brandt ML, Dolan LM. Reversal of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Improvements in Cardiovascular Risk Factors after Surgical Weight Loss in Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan; 123 (1): 214-22

Levitsky LL, et al. Adolescent Obesity and Bariatric Surgery. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity. 2009 Feb; 16(1): 37-44

ASBS Consensus Conference Statement. Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Health Implications for Patients, Health Professionals, and Third-Party Payers in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2004; 1: 371–381

Prevention and Treatment of Pediatric Obesity. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008 Dec;93(12):4576-4599.

Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liaberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean APH, McLean LD. Surgery Decrease Long-Term Mortality, Morbidity and Health Care Use in Morbidly Obese Patients. Annals of Surgery. 2004 Sep;240(3):416-24.

Brethauer SA, Hammel, JP, Schauer PR. Systematic Review of Sleeve Gastrectomy as Staging and Primary Bariatric Procedure. Surg for Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jul;5(4):469-75.

Fuks D. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery. 2009 Jan;145(1):106-13.

Uglioni B. Midterm results of primary vs. secondary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as an isolated operation. Obes Surg. 2009 Apr;19(4):401-6.

Arias E. Mid-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy as a final approach for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009 May;19(5):544-8.

Kakoulidis TP. Initial results with sleeve gastrectomy for patients with class I obesity (BMI 30-35 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jul;5(4):425-8.

Peterli R. Improvement in glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: comparison of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):234-41.

Sánchez-Santos R. Short- and mid-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: the experience of the Spanish National Registry. Obes Surg. 2009 Sep;19(9):1203-10.

Lewis CE. Early experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage bariatric procedure. Am Surg. 2009 Oct; 75(10):945-9.

Ward M, Prachand V. Surgical Treatment of Obesity. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2009 Nov;70(5):985-90.