Highmark Medical Policy Bulletin

Section: Surgery
Number: S-150
Topic: Radiofrequency Facet Nerve Denervation
Effective Date: March 28, 2011
Issued Date: March 28, 2011
Date Last Reviewed: 01/2011

General Policy Guidelines

Indications and Limitations of Coverage

Radiofrequency Facet Nerve Denervation (64622, 64623, 64626, 64627, 64999, and 77003) is a procedure done as a treatment modality for patients with a variety of chronic spinal pain syndromes, including facet joint pain syndrome. This procedure is eligible when performed for any of these indications:

  • Low back (lumbosacral) or neck (cervical) pain, suggestive of facet joint origin as evidenced by absence of nerve root compression as documented in the medical record on history, physical and radiographic evaluations; and the pain is not radicular;
  • Pain has failed to respond to three (3) months of conservative management which may consist of therapies such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, acetaminophen, manipulation, physical therapy, and a home exercise program;
  • A trial of a controlled diagnostic medial branch block under fluoroscopic guidance has resulted in at least a 50% reduction in pain; and
  • If there has been a prior successful radiofrequency (RF) denervation, a minimum time of six (6) months has elapsed since prior RF treatment (per side, per anatomical level of the spine).

Radiofrequency denervation is considered experimental/investigational for the treatment of chronic spinal/back pain for all uses that do not meet the criteria listed above, including, but not limited to, treatment of thoracic facet or sacroiliac (SI) joint pain. The current peer reviewed literature is limited and non-conclusive for indications other than those listed. A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for the denied service.

Pulsed radiofrequency (64999) effectiveness has not yet been established and should be considered experimental/investigational. The current peer reviewed literature is limited and non-conclusive. A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for the denied service.

Description

Radiofrequency facet denervation or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was introduced as a treatment modality for patients with a variety of chronic spinal pain syndromes, including facet joint pain syndrome. RFA is referred to by numerous terms, including percutaneous nonpulsed radiofrequency facet denervation, thermal radiofrequency, percutaneous facet coagulation, percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy, radiofrequency facet rhizotomy, and radiofrequency articular rhizolysis. RFA is a pain-reduction technique that may be considered for patients with back pain that is unresponsive to conservative management and for which there is no clear indication for surgery.

Patients generally are sedated for the RFA procedure. Under local anesthetic and with fluoroscopic guidance, a needle is directed to the median branch of the dorsal ganglion in the facet joint, where multiple thermal lesions are produced by a radiofrequency generator. During RFA, an electrode introduced through the skin is used to deliver heat produced by radio waves in order to destroy the sympathetic nerve supply of the painful spinal structure.

Pulsed radiofrequency consists of short bursts of electrical current of high voltage in the radiofrequency range but without heating the tissue enough to cause coagulation. Temperatures do not exceed 42°C at the probe tip versus temperatures in the 60°s C reached in thermal RF denervation, and tissues may cool between pulses. It is postulated that transmission across small unmyelinated nerve fibers is disrupted but not permanently damaged, while large myelinated fibers are not affected.


NOTE:
This policy is designed to address medical guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness, or condition. Each person's unique clinical circumstances may warrant individual consideration, based on review of applicable medical records.

Procedure Codes

646226462364626646276499977003

Traditional (UCR/Fee Schedule) Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

FEP Guidelines

This medical policy may not apply to FEP. Medical policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits, or a contract. Benefits are determined by the Federal Employee Program.

Comprehensive / Wraparound / PPO / Major Medical Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

Any reference in this bulletin to non-billable services by a network provider may not be applicable to Major Medical.

Managed Care (HMO/POS) Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

Publications

PRN

04/2011, New coverage criteria for radiofrequency facet nerve denervation defined

References

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Task Force on Pain Management, Chronic Pain Section. Practice Guidelines for Chronic Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(4):995-1004.

van Wijk RMAW, Geurts JW, Wynne HJ, Hammink E, Buskens E, Lousberg R, et al. Radiofrequency denervation of lumbar facet joints in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, sham lesion-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):335-44. Erratum in: Clin J Pain. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):462.

American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Occupational medicine practice guidelines: evaluation and management of common health problems and functional recovery of workers, low back disorders. 2nd ed. Glass L, editor. Beverly Farms, MA:OEM Press 2007.

O’Neill C, Owens DK. Lumbar facet joint pain: time to hit the reset button. Spine J. 2009;9(8):619-22.

Malik K, Benzon HT. Pulsed radiofrequency: A critical review of its efficacy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35(6):863-873.

Tekin I, Mirzai H, Ok G, Erbuyun K, Vatansever D. A comparison of conventional and pulsed radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic facet joint pain. Clin J Pain. 2007 Jul-Aug;23(6):524-9.

Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al. Interventional Techniques: Evidence-based Practice Guidelines in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain. Pain Physician. 2007;10:7-111.

Nath S, Nath CA, Pettersson K. Percutaneous lumbar zygapophysial (Facet) joint neurotomyusing radiofrequency current, in the management of chronic low back pain: a randomized double-blind trial. Spine. 2008 May 20;33(12):1291-7. Discussion 1298.
 
Simopoulos TT, Kraemer J, Nagda JV, et al. Response to pulsed and continuous radiofrequency lesioning of the dorsal root ganglion and segmental nerves in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain. Pain Physician. 2008;11(2):137-144.

Malik K, Benzon HT. Radiofrequency applications to dorsal root ganglia: A literature review. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(3):527-542.

Atluri S, Datta S, Falco FJ, et al. Systematic review of diagnostic utility and therapeutic effectiveness of thoracic facet joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2008;11(5):611-29.

Datta S, Lee M, Falco FJ, et al. Systematic review of diagnostic utility and therapeutic utility of lumbar facet joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2009;12(2):437-60.

Karnezis IA. Minimally invasive therapeutic interventional procedures in the spine: an evidence-based review. Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:259-68.

van Boxem K, van Eerd M, Brinkhuizen T, et al. Radiofrequency and pulsed radiofrequency treatment of chronic pain syndromes: the available evidence. Pain Pract. 2008;8(5):385-93.

Kroll HR, Kim D, Danic MJ, et al. A randomized, double-blind, prospective study comparing the efficacy of continuous versus pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome. J Clin Anesth. 2008;20(7):534-7.

Chou R, Atlas SJ, Stanos SP, et al. Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: A review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guideline. Spine. 2009;34(10):1078-93.

Falco FJ, Erhart S, Wargo BW, et al. Systematic review of diagnostic utility and therapeutic effectiveness of cervical facet joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2009;12(2):323-44.

Pampati S, Cash KA, Manchikanti L. Accuracy of diagnostic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks: a 2-year follow-up of 152 patients diagnosed with controlled diagnostic blocks. Pain Physician. 2009;12(5):855-66.

Cohen SP, Strassels SA, Kurihara C, et al. Randomized study assessing the accuracy of cervical facet joint nerve (medial branch) blocks using different injectate volumes. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(1):144-52.

Manchikanti L, Pampati S, Cash KA. Making sense of the accuracy of diagnostic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks: an assessment of the implications of 50% relief, 80% relief, single block, or controlled diagnostic blocks. Pain Physician. 2010Mar;13(2):133-43.

Van Zundert J, Mekhail N, Vanelderen P, et al. Diagnostic medial branch blocks before lumbar radiofrequency zygapophysial (facet) joint denervation: benefit or burden? Anesthesiology. 2010Aug;113(2):276-8.

Cohen SP, Williams KA, Kurihara C, et al. Multicenter, randomized, comparative cost-effectiveness study comparing 0, 1, and 2 diagnostic medial branch (facet joint nerve) block treatment paradigms before lumbar facet radiofrequency denervation. Anesthesiology. 2010Aug;113(2):395-405.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. Radiofrequency Facet Nerve Denervation. Medical Policy Reference Manual 7.01.116. Issued June 2010.

View Previous Versions

No Previous Versions

Table Attachment

Text Attachment

Procedure Code Attachments

Diagnosis Codes

Covered Diagnosis Codes

721.0721.1721.2721.3
721.41721.42722.81722.82
722.83723.1724.1724.2

Glossary





Medical policies do not constitute medical advice, nor are they intended to govern the practice of medicine. They are intended to reflect Highmark's reimbursement and coverage guidelines. Coverage for services may vary for individual members, based on the terms of the benefit contract.

Highmark retains the right to review and update its medical policy guidelines at its sole discretion. These guidelines are the proprietary information of Highmark. Any sale, copying or dissemination of the medical policies is prohibited; however, limited copying of medical policies is permitted for individual use.